By: Carissa H.
| Abstract |
| Purpose |
| Hypothesis |
| Experiment Design |
| Materials |
| Procedures |
| Research Report |
| Results |
| Conclusions |
| Bibliography |
The purpose of this experiment is to determine how radishes grow in different hydroponic environments. The environments were simulated microgravity, sand, potting soil, and water.
The first step was to grow the plants in a paper towel with water only. Then assemble the different variations of the hydroponic environments. The plants grew in the different environments for two weeks. I measured the mass of the plants before and after the experiment. I then measured the mass through biomass.
The plants grew the best in the potting soil environment and worst in the simulated microgravity environment. The mass of plants in the sand and water environments were in the middle when compared to the other environments.
My results indicate that my hypothesis should be accepted. I had hypothesized that the plants growing in the potting soil would have the most alive plant mass and the plants growing in simulated microgravity would have the least.
The purpose of this experiment is to determine how radishes grow in different hydroponic environments. The environments were simulated microgravity, sand, potting soil, and water.
I became interested in this project when my teacher was telling me about a similar experiment that had been done. I did a previous project with hydroponics before and thought that this idea seemed interesting.
Astronauts could find this information useful because one of the environments is simulated microgravity. Gardeners will also find the results interesting to know how to produce the best vegetables.
My hypothesis is that the group growing in simulated microgravity will have the least amount of growth and living plants. I also think that the group growing in potting soil will have the most growth and living plants. I base my hypothesis on the fact that gardeners often use potting soil to enhance their soil and get high-quality results.
The manipulated variable was the growing environment for the plants. The growing environments were simulated microgravity, potting soil, sand, and water. The responding variable is the amount of plant growth. The responding variable was measured after three weeks by using biomass and comparing it to the original mass of the plants.
The constants in this experiment were:
QUANTITY ITEM DESCRIPTION
1
Bag, Children’s play sand
1
Bag, potting soil
2
Clear containers that are at least 3 cm deep
10
Connectors 30 cm each
1
Measuring cup in mL
1
Meter, yarn
1
Oven
3
Packet, of seed (Champion seed was used)
1
Pair of wire cutters
3
Plastic containers for the sand, potting soil, and water environments
1
Roll, hardware cloth ¼” (6 mm)
1
Roll, paper towels
1
Rotational Christmas tree base/stand
Shredded paper (enough to fill the inside of the microgravity environment)
1
Spray bottle
1
Triple-beam balance
1
Watering container
1
Wooden dowel 63 cm long with a tapered edge and 2.5 cm thick
1. Place a paper towel
in an area where they can grow for a few weeks without disturbance.
2. Empty the three packets
of seeds onto a paper towel, spreading them out evenly.
3. Place another paper
towel on top of the seeds.
4. Spray the seeds thoroughly
with a spray bottle.
5. Now use a three cm
deep pan to cover the seeds while germinating.
6. Water the seeds every
couple of hours using the spray bottle.
7. After four days of
growing as explained above, transfer half of the plants to another environment
similar to the one above and continue to let them grow.
8. Cover both environments
with a clear lid/pan to allow sunlight to reach the plants.
9. After one week of
continuously watering the plants, start the experiment.
PROCEDURES (b)
1. With the wire cutters,
cut two pieces of hardware cloth to be 30 cm x 21.5 cm.
2. Cut one piece of
hardware cloth to be 44 cm x 21.5 cm this is to be used in the water environment.
3. Cut one piece of
hardware cloth to be 53 cm x 60 cm this is to be used for the simulated
microgravity environment.
4. Cut the 10 connectors
out of twine wire.
5. Drill 10 holes through
the wooden dowel.
6. Maneuver the wire
through the holes and have half of each connecter on each side.
7. Connect the hardware
cloth in a circle around the wooden dowel by fastening the connecters to
it.
8. Sew the hardware
cloth together at the ends.
9. In all three containers
fill to 7 cm deep of a substance (water, potting soil, or sand).
10. Count out 20 plants from each
container to form the testing environments.
11. Using the triple-beam balance
determine the starting mass of each group of plants.
12. Now carefully thread the plants
through the hardware cloth in the potting soil, sand, and water environments
so that the roots are going into the substance.
13. In the simulated microgravity
environment thread the plants through the hardware cloth so that the roots
are growing on the inside.
14. Using shredded paper, stuff
the inside of the microgravity environment to withhold moisture to the
plants.
15. In the potting soil and sand
environments add 2000 mL of water evenly distributed to the plants.
16. Water the microgravity environment
two times a day with the watering can and add water to the other environments
every three days.
PROCEDURES (c)
1. After two weeks remove
the plants from the different environments keeping them separated.
2. Find the mass of
each group individually.
3. Heat a oven to 250º
F (121º C)
4. Cook the plants for
10 minutes.
5. Find the mass of
each group individually after they have been cooked.
The purpose of this experiment was to determine in which hydroponic condition plants grow best. The results from my experiment show that the potting soil was the best substance to grow the plants in with the water group next. The sand group was the third best to grow the plants in and the simulated microgravity environment was the worst variation to grow the plants with.
PLANT GROWTH WHILE IN VARIATIONS OF A HYDROPONIC ENVIRONMENT
| GROUP | STARTING MASS | ENDING MASS | DIFFERENCE | BIOMASS |
| water | 6.49 | 3.73 | 2.76 | 0.76 |
| potting soil | 7.25 | 4.06 | 3.19 | 1.36 |
| sand | 7.63 | 2.21 | 5.42 | 0.54 |
| simulated microgravity1 | 7.74 | 0.27 | 7.47 | 0.27 |
| simlulated microgravity2 | 8.31 | 0.36 | 7.59 | 0.36 |
The results from this experiment show that potting soil is the best substance to grow plants in hydroponically while simulated microgravity is the least supportive to growth. Sand and water are also substances in which plants can be grown hydroponically but are not the most supportive. My hypothesis was that potting soil would have the most living matter and the simulated hydroponic environment would have the least. Due to my results I now accept my hypothesis. Because of the experiment I wonder how the astronauts have grown plants in space. I am also wondering if radishes are a plant that cannot be grown hydroponically. Another question I have is if I had added minerals to the water that the plants were growing in would it have caused the results to change. Some possible sources for error are that no matter how much I watered the simulated microgravity environment it never retained water. To improve this experiment I would test several types of plants instead of just one.
ADVANCED ASTROCULTURE. NASA. 07 Jan. 2002 <http://www.spaceref.com/iss/payloads/advasc.html>.
Bates, Dr., Jeffery . SEEDS TO PLANTS. New York, NY: Gloucester P, 1991.
HOW PLANTS DETECT GRAVITY. Science Daily Magazine. 07 Jan. 2002 <http://www.sciencedaily.com/release/1999/07/990727073836.htm>
HYDROPONICS. Crop King. 03 Jan. 2002 <http://www.cropking.com>.
PLANT NUTRIENTS. General Hydroponics. 10
Dec. 2001
<http://www.generalhydroponics.com/nutrients.html>.
RADISHES. The Gardeners Companion. 03 Jan. 2002 <http://www.almanac.com/garden/radishes.html>.
SPACE STATION SCIENCE. NASA. 03 Jan. 2002 <http://microgravity.grc.nasa.gov>.
WISCONSIN CENTER FOR SPACE AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS
. 20 Feb. 1996. Dr. Raymond J. Bula. 02 Jan. 2002 <http://liftoff.msfc.nasa.gov/shuttle/USML2/science/asc.html>.